Usporedba izvještavanja o Haškoj presudi "Bosanskohercegovačkoj šestorci": mainstream i neprofitni mediji

master's thesis

• Title (english): Reporting on the Hague Verdict of "the Bosnian Six": Mainstream and Nonprofit Media
• Author: Melita Vrsaljko
• Mentor: Gordana Vilović (mentor)
• Committee member: Gordana Vilović (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Dunja Majstorović Jedovnicki (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Marina Mučalo (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; The Faculty of Political Science; (Department of Journalism and Media Production); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2018-06-26, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Information and Communication Sciences; Journalism

Abstract

Cilj ovog istraživanja je prikazati kako su mainstream i neprofitni mediji pratili presudu bosansko-hercegovačkoj šestorci te uočiti na koje su načine kršili novinarske standarde. Rad se fokusira na odnos tih medija prema ratu u BiH i bošnjačkim žrtvama te na reprezentaciju ratnog zločinca i prikazivanje samoubojstva. U svrhu dokazivanja hipoteze utjecaju senzacionalizma i pristranosti u izvještavanju o presudi i samoubojstvu Slobodana Praljka, korištene su metode kvantitativne i kvalitativne analize sadržaja, odnosno, analize diskursa. Rezultati pokazuju da su svjetonazorske razlike u izvještavanju puno veće između neprofitnih medija liberalne i konzervativne orijentacije, nego što su one između dnevnih novina i elektroničkih publikacija te da se po kršenju novinarskih načela najviše ističu mediji koji zagovaraju tradicionalne vrijednosti. Posebice je zabrinjavajuće i štetno prikazivanje samoubojstva kao časnog čina te njegovo opravdavanje, što predstavlja najkritičniji primjer kršenja etičkih normi.

Abstract (english)

The aim of this research is to show how mainstream and non-profit media followed the verdict against six Bosnian Croats and observe how they violated journalistic standards. Focus of the research is on the relation of these media to the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Muslim victims, representation of a war criminal and suicide. In order to prove the hypothesis of the influence of sensationalism in reporting of verdict and suicide of Slobodan Praljak, methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis of content were used,. The results show that differences in reporting are much bigger between non-profit liberal and conservative media, rather than between mainstream daily newspapers and electronic publications. It is particularly worrying and harmful to justify suicide and represent it as an honorary act, which presents the most critical example of violation of ethical norms.

• Keywords: MKSJ (ICTY); tribunal; presuda; bosansko-hercegovačka šestorka; mediji
• Keywords (english): ICTY; tribunal; verdict; Bosnian Croats; media
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:114:392923
• Study programme: Title: Journalism; Study programme type: university; Study level: graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra novinarstva (magistar/magistra novinarstva)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
• Created on: 2018-12-03 11:59:48