Ukrajinsko - ruski sukob od zajedničke povijesti Kijevske Rus do suvremenog rata

master's thesis

• Title (english): Ukrainian-Russian conflict from the shared history within Kyivan Rus to the current war
• Author: Tony Pavičević
• Mentor: Robert Barić (mentor)
• Committee member: Robert Barić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Petar Popović (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Davor Boban (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; The Faculty of Political Science; Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2024-09-18, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Political Science

Abstract

Autor u radu prikazuje zajednički i odvojeni razvoj dva naroda koji su u konfliktu. Kratki pregled ključnih faktora služi kao uvod u razumijevanje pozadine konflikta. Detaljnom analizom historiografija obiju država prikazan je zajednički razvoj do prve točke divergencije u srednjem vijeku, potom je prikazan odvojeni razvoj uzimajući u obzir vanjske utjecaje. Druga točka divergencije je kratkotrajna ali vrlo kompleksna u turbulentnom periodu ranog dvadesetog stoljeća kulminirajući u trećoj točci divergencije ranih devedesetih godina dvadesetog stoljeća. Svrha istraživanja je u opovrgavanju casus belluma koji predsjednik Ruske Federacije koristi kao opravdanje osvajačkog rata. Samo istraživanje provedeno je analizom historiografija Ukrajine i Rusije, dokumentima te različitih medija. Zaključno, nakon provedene analize autor opovrgava izjave predsjednika Ruske Federacije dokazima sakupljenim kroz povijesni prikaz.

Abstract (english)

The author presents a study of the shared and separate development of two nations, which are in an ongoing conflict. A brief overview of key factors serves as an introduction to understanding the background of the conflict. Through a detailed analysis of the historiographies of both states, the shared development up to the first point of divergence in the Middle Ages is illustrated, followed by the separate development considering external influences. The second point of divergence, though brief, is highly complex, occurring during the turbulent period of the early twentieth century and culminating in the third point of divergence in the early 1990s. The purpose of the research is to refute the casus belli used by the President of the Russian Federation as a justification for the ongoing war of conquest. The research was conducted through an analysis of the historiographies of Ukraine and Russia, documents, and various media sources. In conclusion, after conducting the analysis, the author refutes the statements of the President of the Russian Federation with evidence gathered through the historical review.

• Keywords: ukrajinsko-ruski sukob; historiografija; Ukrajina; Rusija
• Keywords (english): Ukrainian-Russian conflict; historiography; Ukraine; Russia
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:114:675515
• Study programme: Title: Political Science - National security; specializations in: National security; Course: National security; Study programme type: university; Study level: graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra politologije (magistar/magistra politologije)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2024-10-14 11:26:39