Korištenje Fonda europske pomoći za najpotrebitije u Hrvatskoj - dosadašnji učinci i perspektive razvoja

master's thesis

• Title (english): The Use of the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived in Croatia - Past Effects and Perspectives of Development
• Author: Ariana Kostić
• Mentor: Igor Vidačak (mentor)
• Committee member: Igor Vidačak (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Anka Kekez Koštro (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Andrija Henjak (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; The Faculty of Political Science; (Department of Public Policy, Managenment and Development); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2019-09-23, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Political Science; Public Policies/Public Management

Abstract

Ovaj rad bavi se istraživanjem provedbe Fonda europske pomoći za najpotrebitije u Hrvatskoj. Glavni cilj je procjena kvalitete provedbe i identificiranje prostora za poboljšanje u budućnosti. U glavnom djelu rada prikazuju se rezultati provedenog kvalitativnog istraživanja u obliku polustrukturiranih intervjua. Odgovori ispitanika, ali i podaci iz operativnog programa, izvješća Europske komisije i strukturirane ankete krajnjih korisnika, sistematizirani su u evaluacijske kriterije Europske komisije: efektivnost, efikasnost, koherentnost i relevantnost. Tako su identificirana sljedeća područja za poboljšanje: skraćivanje perioda čekanja rezultata i potpisivanja ugovora, pojednostavljenje obrasca za nadoknadu sredstava, povećanje alokacije sredstava za administrativne troškove i tehničku pomoć, osiguravanje pravovaljanih informacija te suradnja s djelatnicima u posredničkom/upravljačkom tijelu s većim znanjem o procesu javne nabave, skraćivanje rokova provjere ispravnosti isplate odobrenih zahtjeva za nadoknadu sredstava te češće provođenje savjetovanja kao popratne mjere.

Abstract (english)

This research aims to examine the implementation of the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived in Croatia. The main objective is to evaluate the quality of implementation and identify areas that require further improvement. The results of the qualitative research conducted in the form of semi-structured interviews are presented. Respondents’ answers, as well as data from the operational program, European Commission reports and structured end-user surveys, are systemized into the European Commission’s evaluation criteria: effectiveness, efficiency, coherence and relevance. Thus, the following areas that require further improvement are identified: shortening the waiting period before signing the contract, simplifying the reimbursement form, increasing the allocation of funds for administrative costs and technical assistance, providing valid information and cooperating with staff in the intermediary/governing body with greater knowledge of the public procurement process, shortening deadlines for verifying reimbursement requests and providing consultations as a side measure more frequently.

• Keywords: FEAD; evaluacija; efektivnost; efikasnost; koherentnost; relevantnost
• Keywords (english): FEAD; evaluation; effectiveness; efficiency; coherence; relevance
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:114:036290
• Study programme: Title: Political Science; Study programme type: university; Study level: graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra politologije (magistar/magistra politologije)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Closed access
• Created on: 2019-11-25 14:07:17